|
July 24, 2020
|
|
|
Correctional and detention facilities are
disproportionately affected by COVID-19 due to shared
space, contact between staff and detained persons, and
movement within facilities of detained persons, many with
pre-existing medical conditions. On March 18, 2020, Cook
County Jail in Chicago, Illinois, one of the United
States' largest, identified its first suspected case of
COVID-19 in a detained person. This analysis includes
SARS-CoV-2 cases confirmed by molecular detection among
detained persons and Cook County Sheriff's Office staff.
The authors examined occurrence of symptomatic cases in
each building and proportions of asymptomatic detained
persons testing positive. They describe timing of
interventions including social distancing, mask use, and
expanded testing and show outbreak trajectory in the jail
versus contemporaneous case counts in Chicago. During
March 1-April 30, 907 symptomatic and asymptomatic cases
of SARS-CoV-2 infection were detected among detained
persons (n = 628) and staff (n = 279), with nine deaths.
Symptomatic cases occurred in all housing divisions; in
9/13 buildings, staff cases occurred first. Among
asymptomatic detained persons in quarantine, 23.6% tested
positive. Programmatic activity and visitation stopped
March 9, cells were converted into single occupancy
beginning March 26, and universal masking was implemented
for staff (April 2) and detained persons (April 13).
Cases at the jail declined while cases in Chicago
increased Illustrating that aggressive intervention
strategies coupled with widespread diagnostic testing of
detained and staff populations can limit introduction and
mitigate transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection in
correctional and detention facilities.
|
Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
|
|
The Procedural Justice-Informed Alternatives to Contempt
(PJAC) demonstration project integrates principles of
procedural justice into enforcement practices in six
child support agencies across the United States.
Procedural justice is fairness in processes that resolve
disputes and result in decisions. Research has shown that
if people perceive a process to be fair, they will be
more likely to comply with the outcome of that process,
whether or not the outcome was favorable to them. Child
support agencies aim to secure payments from noncustodial
parents to support the well-being of their children. The
target population for the PJAC demonstration project is
noncustodial parents at the point of being referred to
the legal system for civil contempt of court because they
have not met their child support obligations, yet have
been determined to have the ability to pay. The PJAC
demonstration project aims to address parents’ reasons
for nonpayment, improve the consistency of their
payments, and promote their positive engagement with the
child support agency and the other parent.
This report is the third in a series developed primarily
for child support practitioners and administrators that
shares lessons learned as the six participating child
support agencies implement the PJAC model. It describes
the characteristics of the noncustodial parents in the
PJAC study sample and what case managers believe led them
to the point of contempt. PJAC noncustodial parents had
cases that were opened an average of nine years before
they entered the study, and they tended to have high debt
balances. These parents often had histories of limited
communication and poor relationships with child support
agencies. These factors may have affected PJAC case
managers’ ability to serve families in the sample to
varying degrees and in various ways across sites. PJAC
case managers have been equipped with tools informed by
procedural justice to engage and serve noncustodial
parents and early findings suggest that these tools are
helping PJAC case managers engage families.
|
Source: MDRC
|
|
Eyewitness misidentification accounts for 70% of verified
erroneous convictions. To address this alarming
phenomenon, research has focused on factors that
influence likelihood of correct identification, such as
the manner in which a lineup is conducted. Traditional
lineups rely on overt eyewitness responses that confound
two covert factors: strength of recognition memory and
the criterion for deciding what memory strength is
sufficient for identification. Here the authors describe
a lineup that permits estimation of memory strength
independent of decision criterion. This procedure employs
powerful techniques developed in studies of perception
and memory: perceptual scaling and signal detection
analysis. Using these tools, the authors scale memory
strengths elicited by lineup faces, and quantify
performance of a binary classifier tasked with
distinguishing perpetrator from innocent suspect. This
approach reveals structure of memory inaccessible using
traditional lineups and renders accurate identifications
uninfluenced by decision bias. The approach furthermore
yields a quantitative index of individual eyewitness
performance.
|
Source: Nature Commons
|
|
Autonomous vehicles promise many benefits, but questions
remain about how law enforcement officers will interact
with them. Officers likely will encounter new challenges
related to technology, procedures, and constitutional
authorities. To better understand the potential
challenges of law enforcement interactions with
autonomous vehicles, a convened workshop of practitioners
and researchers identified the highest-priority problems
and associated needs related to autonomous vehicles
within the next five years. Workshop participants
identified 33 needs that revolved around three broad
themes: (1) designing a means of communicating with
autonomous vehicles that also maintains cybersecurity;
(2) improving stakeholder communication and
collaboration; and (3) developing standard procedures,
guidelines, and training needs for law enforcement
interacting with autonomous vehicles. The consensus was
that many of the short-term needs identified in this
report require a response and that law enforcement
agencies should begin proactive preparations to address
longer-term challenges before being forced into reactive
changes. Workshop participants expressed the need to
ensure that all autonomous vehicles are programmed to
behave in the same way in each interaction with first
responders so that procedures do not have to change based
on the make and model of the car and that it is critical
for law enforcement and developers to work together to
determine how interactions should occur and what
behaviors can be expected of autonomous vehicles.
Standardization is critical, especially for vehicles that
feature higher levels of autonomy.
|
Source: RAND Corporation
|
|
|
The 2019 General Appropriations Act directed OPPAGA to
contract with an independent third party consulting firm
to conduct a review of the Florida’s State University
System (linked above) and the Florida College Systems. To complete these studies,
OPPAGA contracted with SmithGroup, Inc., a national
consulting firm. As directed, the reviews evaluate
whether state-level processes and those used by
individual institutions are consistent with the
institution's overall mission, and support state-level
goals; examines space and utilization factors to
determine whether they accurately reflect deficits or
surpluses of each type of space and result in the most
efficient and effective use of space; and assesses the
extent to which each institution efficiently and
effectively utilizes its current space.
|
Source: Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government
Accountability (OPPAGA)
|
|
This annual report examines crime occurring in schools
and colleges. This report presents data on crime at
school from the perspectives of students, teachers,
principals, and the general population from an array of
sources—the National Crime Victimization Survey, the
School Crime Supplement to the National Crime
Victimization Survey, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, the
School Survey on Crime and Safety, the Schools and
Staffing Survey, EDFacts, and the Campus Safety and
Security Survey. The report covers topics such as
victimization, bullying, school conditions, fights,
weapons, the presence of security staff at school,
availability and student use of drugs and alcohol,
student perceptions of personal safety at school, and
criminal incidents at postsecondary institutions.
Preliminary data show that there were 42
school-associated violent deaths from July 1, 2016,
through June 30, 2017. In 2018, among students ages
12–18, there were about 836,100 total victimizations
(theft and nonfatal violent victimization) at school and
410,200 victimizations away from school. During the
2017–18 school year, 35% of public schools (28,700
schools) took at least one serious disciplinary action
for specific offenses. Of the 958 total hate crimes
reported on college campuses in 2017, the most common
type of hate crime was destruction, damage, and vandalism
(437 incidents), followed by intimidation (385 incidents)
and simple assault (83 incidents).
|
Source: National Center for Educational Statistics,
U.S. Department of Education
|
|
As college and university leaders look to repopulate
their campuses this fall, physical distancing protocols
(including use of face masks, maintaining six feet of
distance from others, and limits on large gatherings)
will be crucial to keeping campus safe. While achieving
perfect adherence to physical distancing on a college
campus is unrealistic, institutions need to do everything
they can to maximize compliance among students. In early
June, the authors surveyed about 70 institutions on their
plans to promote and enforce physical distancing on
campus. The authors found three major trends: safety
kits, using positive influence to educate and promote
physical distancing, and uncertainty around enforcement.
Sixty-seven percent of institutions surveyed will provide
students with COVID-19 safety kits in the fall. Common
approaches institutions will use to educate students
include social norming campaigns on social media, regular
campus-wide communications from senior leaders, and
leveraging student leaders or campus influencers to
promote distancing. In terms of enforcing physical
distancing guidelines, only 17% of respondents are
updating their code of conduct to incorporate physical
distancing or quarantine guidelines, but there may be
changes: 37% are considering making changes and 11% were
unsure.
|
Source: EAB
|
|
Education in the United States, as across the globe,
changed dramatically when schools across the country
closed in spring 2020 and students were asked to learn
remotely. There is a critical opportunity now to listen
to and learn from students’ lived experiences during this
unprecedented time. As we navigate the challenges ahead,
students’ voices must be central to the way school is
reimagined. This report shares data and insights gathered
from the Students Weigh In: Learning & Well-Being During
COVID-19 survey. This approximately 12 minute online
survey, fielded from May 11th and June 19th in English
and Spanish, asked 5th to 12th grade students
age-appropriate questions about their school experience,
social and emotional development, and well-being during
the unprecedented spring 2020 school closures. Over
20,000 students responded from 166 schools across 9
states. Only half of students said their teachers give
them assignments that really help them learn and 39% said
they learn a lot every day. The most frequently cited
obstacles to virtual learning were distractions at home
(64%) and feeling depressed, stressed, or anxious (50%).
On average, Black and Latinx students faced more
obstacles than White and Asian students. On average,
about half of students rated their relationships with
teachers and adults in school positively – but only one
in three rated their sense of belonging positively. Male
students rated their health and well-being more
positively than did female students and students who
identify in another way. One in five high school seniors’
postsecondary plans have changed.
|
Source: YouthTruth
|
|
|
The COVID-19 pandemic shows how biological threats have
the potential to cause loss of life and sustained damage
to the economy, societal stability, and global security.
During the pandemic, 57 major disaster declarations were
simultaneously issued for all U.S. states, the District
of Columbia, and U.S. territories—the first time in
history this has occurred. The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) had obligated about $5.8 billion
for the response as of May 31, 2020. This statement
addresses (1) FEMA's role in managing the COVID-19
pandemic, including efforts to acquire and distribute
critical medical supplies, as well as (2) potential
challenges for this and other biological incident
responses. As part of the interagency group with
responsibility for leading the whole-of-nation response
and the federal official responsible for the operations
of the National Response Coordination Center (NRCC), the
FEMA Administrator has a key role in managing the
COVID-19 response. This includes responding to states’
needs for critical medical supplies. The authors identify
several challenges for FEMA in this and future responses.
Challenges include issues with contract coordination
between FEMA other federal agencies, and states and
localities; concerns about the distribution, acquisition,
and adequacy of supplies from the Strategic National
Stockpile and other sources; and issues deploying
disaster workforce in addition to COVID-19. This
statement is based on products the authors issued from
August 2003 to June 2020, as well as ongoing efforts to
monitor contract obligations. For these products, the
authors reviewed relevant presidential directives,
statutes, regulations, policies, strategic plans, other
reports, as well as federal procurement data; and
interviewed federal and state officials, among others.
|
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office
|
|
The “10-20-30 formula” has been applied to appropriations
for some federal programs since 2009. It requires that
agencies use at least 10% of designated program funds in
counties that have had poverty rates of at least 20% over
the last 30 years (also known as “persistent-poverty
counties”). Legislation proposed in 2019 (H.R. 2055)
would apply the formula to more programs for funds
appropriated over the next 10 years. It also would
require these programs to increase funding in
“high-poverty areas”— census tracts with a poverty rate
of at least 20% over the last 5 years. The authors
identified 247 programs across 14 agencies that may fall
within the scope of this bill. As of 2017,
persistent-poverty counties were predominantly rural and
more frequently located in the South than in other
regions. The authors identified 409 persistent-poverty
counties (13% of all counties), roughly 50% of which were
rural. In contrast, high-poverty census tracts —which
represented 28% of all census tracts—were frequently
urban (74%). Publically reported federal spending data do
not include census tracts. The authors determined that
ZIP codes were the best available substitute, and 77% of
high-poverty ZIP codes overlapped with a high-poverty
census tract. Of the 247 programs potentially subject to
H.R. 2055, 114 (accounting for $87 billion in spending)
had sufficiently complete county-level data in
USAspending.gov. In fiscal years 2017–2019, agencies
used 8% of funds in persistent-poverty counties under
these programs. Individual agencies’ funding levels
varied, but agencies used less than 10% of funding in
persistent-poverty counties under 68 programs (60% of
programs with sufficient data). This included 27 programs
that did not have any funds used in these areas. Fewer
programs had sufficiently complete ZIP code-level data
(46 programs, accounting for $4.9 billion in spending),
but agencies used higher percentages of funds in
high-poverty ZIP codes (37%) under these programs.
|
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office
|
|
The COVID-19 public health crisis, the economic shock
triggered by the pandemic, and public policy, business,
and individual responses to the pandemic together have
provoked the sharpest and fastest economic downturn in
U.S. history. Both the pandemic and the fiscal policy
response have ebbed and flowed, and the economy remains
fragile. This report discusses how the current crisis
fits into historic context and what will be the
long-lasting economic consequences. In particular,
policymakers will need to address increasing
concentration among businesses, accelerating automation,
and stark reductions in labor force participation among
certain groups. An effective response will require
renewed emphasis on antitrust enforcement, changes to the
labor market to ensure that those with less education are
not left behind, and support for parents, caregivers, and
those with compromised health to help keep them attached
to the labor market. Policy needs to focus on pushing the
economy back to its full potential and cushioning those
most directly harmed by the downturn. But policymakers
also need to prepare for the fact that, much as
individuals are changed by extended periods of isolation
or fear, the economy will not go back to exactly what it
was before. In addition to the many policies that were
needed prior to the pandemic to support broadly shared
economic growth, in the wake of this health and economic
crisis there will need to be a renewed emphasis on
antitrust, on making sure a reimagined economy can
provide far reaching opportunities, and on ensuring that
people have the support they need to participate in the
labor force.
|
Source: Brookings Institute
|
|
|
Three children died in U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) custody between December 2018 and May 2019,
prompting questions about CBP's medical care for those in
its custody. In July 2019, an emergency supplemental
appropriations act was enacted, providing additional
funds to CBP, including funds for consumables and medical
care. As of May 2020, U.S. Customs and Border Protection
within the Department of Homeland Security had obligated
nearly $87 million of the approximately $112 million it
received specifically for consumables and medical care in
a 2019 emergency supplemental appropriations act. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection obligated some of these
funds for consumable goods and services, like food and
hygiene products, as well as medical care goods and
services such as defibrillators, masks, and gloves.
However, CBP obligated some of these funds for other
purposes in violation of appropriations law. For example,
CBP obligated some of these funds for goods and services
for its canine program; equipment for facility operations
like printers and speakers; transportation items that did
not have a primary purpose of medical care like
motorcycles and dirt bikes; and facility upgrades and
services like sewer system upgrades. Until CBP develops
and implements additional guidance, and establishes
oversight roles and responsibilities, the agency does not
have assurance that the remainder of funds appropriated
for consumables and medical care—about $25 million as of
May 2020—will be obligated consistent with the purpose of
the funds. The authors provide several recommendations
including developing oversight mechanisms and updating
internal data reporting systems to include categories on
suicide attempt and serious injuries.
|
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office
|
|
The Missouri Foundation for Health launched The Right
Time program in 2019 to increase contraceptive access and
use by improving clinical supply, community awareness,
and environmental supports so Missouri women and families
are empowered in their own health care decisions. This
report documents the launch of the program in early 2019
and presents baseline information and learning from
implementing the program that year. These findings will
support course corrections, inform decision making, and
maximize overall learning from the program. Key findings
include (1) the program is notable for its
multidimensional approach and emphasis on achieving
health equity, specifically achieving equitable access
and outcomes for all women, regardless of income, race or
ethnicity, disability status, sexual orientation, gender
identity, immigration status, and age; (2) participating
clinics have seen a slight increase in contraceptive use
among their patients -- the number of women using
contraception increased by 3% between visit intake and
exit and more than 20% of women switched from
less-effective non-hormonal methods to more-effective
hormonal methods; (3) media outreach included a
standalone website, social media platforms, paid media,
and earned media -- in-reach client referrals ranged from
posters for clinics to palm cards for patients; and (4)
program staff and community partners held meetings and
organized community events to advance the advocacy
agenda, engaged with coalitions and work groups to
promote relevant administrative and regulatory policies,
and worked with policymakers to strengthen and coordinate
policy efforts related to reproductive health.
|
Source: Mathematica
|
|
This report is designed to help state and local child
welfare leaders maximize opportunities, available through
the federal Family First Prevention Services Act, aimed
at preventing children from entering foster care.
Maximizing these opportunities requires thoughtful
planning. State and local child welfare leaders must
examine the array of prevention services they already
provide and consider existing or new services that can
meet the needs of their children and families, as well as
the Family First standards. Child welfare leaders must
also understand the fiscal implications of implementing
the prevention provisions. Of particular significance,
under Family First, families do not have to meet
income-eligibility standards, as they do with Title IV-E
funds, for states to receive federal reimbursement for
prevention services. The law also put in place standards
of evidence that prevention programs must meet to be
federally reimbursable. This report and supporting fiscal
analysis tools can help child welfare leaders conduct
effective fiscal planning for the Family First prevention
provisions.
|
Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation
|
N O T E : An online subscription may be required to view some items.
|
|
OPPAGA is currently accepting applications for a part-time, academic year
Graduate Student Position.
OPPAGA is an ideal setting for gaining hands-on experience in policy analysis
and working on a wide range of issues of interest to the Florida Legislature.
OPPAGA provides an opportunity to work in a legislative policy research offices
with a highly qualified, multidisciplinary staff that includes public administrators,
social scientists, accountants, MBA graduates, and others.
|
|
|
Government Program Summaries (GPS) is a free resource for legislators and the public that provides descriptive information on over 200 state government programs. To provide fiscal data, GPS links to Transparency
Florida, the Legislature's website that includes continually updated information on the state's operating budget and daily expenditures by state agencies.
|
A publication of the Florida Legislature's Office of Program Policy Analysis & Government Accountability
PolicyNotes, published every Friday, features reports, articles, and websites with timely information of interest to policymakers and researchers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations
expressed by third parties as reported in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect OPPAGA's views.
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
PolicyNotes provided that this section is preserved on all copies.
|
|
|