July 23, 2021
|
|
|
This report presents statistics on drug and alcohol use
among prisoners before they were imprisoned, highlighting
differences by demographic characteristics. The report
details prisoners’ participation in drug and alcohol
treatment programs since admission to prison.
Additionally, it describes the percentage of prisoners
who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, Fourth Edition dependence or abuse criteria
for alcohol or drug use disorder. Highlights from the
report include that 31% of state prisoners and 25% of
federal prisoners reported drinking alcohol at the time
of the offense. Nearly 4 in 10 state prisoners (39%) and
3 in 10 federal prisoners (31%) reported using drugs at
the time of the offense. Among state prisoners, males
(32%) were more likely than females (26%) to report
drinking alcohol at the time of the offense, but were
less likely (39%) than females (49%) to report using at
least one drug at the time of the offense. An estimated 2
in 10 state (21%) and federal (20%) prisoners reported
using marijuana at the time of the offense.
|
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of
Justice
|
|
A total of 681 state and local law enforcement training
academies provided basic training instruction to 59,511
recruits in 2018. The average length of the core basic
training program was 833 hours. Half of recruits were
instructed using a training model with equal parts stress
(i.e., military or paramilitary style) and non-stress
(i.e., academic or adult learning) environments. Nearly
all recruits were instructed in report writing, defensive
tactics, firearms skills, and ethics and integrity, and
nearly all were instructed using at least one type of
reality-based scenario. Half (48%) of full-time
instructors employed by law enforcement training
academies were sworn officers who were permanently
assigned to or employed by the academy. Twenty-five
percent of academies required instructors to have a
2-year college degree or higher level of education, and
70% required law enforcement experience. Of recruits who
began basic training in 2018, about 19% were female and
81% were male. Sixty-four percent of beginning recruits
were white, 14% were black, and 17% were Hispanic in
2018. During basic training, 82% of recruits were trained
on identifying and responding to the use of excessive
force by other officers. About half of recruits were
trained in each of the three types of physical restraint
control tactics for use in the field: 46% were trained in
hold or neck restraints, 50% in the use of full body
restraints, and 48% in leg hobble or other restraints
(excluding handcuffs).
|
Source: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of
Justice
|
|
This report provides official estimates of school crime
and safety from a variety of data sources, including
national surveys of students, teachers, principals, and
post-secondary institutions. Highlights from the report
include that in 2019, students ages 12-18 experienced
764,600 victimizations at school and 509,300
victimizations away from school. About 22% of students
ages 12-18 reported being bullied at school during the
school year in 2019, which was lower than the percentage
who reported being bullied in 2009 (28%). In 2019, of
students ages 12-18, about 9% reported a gang presence at
their school during the school year, 7% reported being
called hate-related words, and 23% reported seeing
hate-related graffiti. Between 2009 and 2019, the
percentage of students in grades 9–12 who reported
carrying a weapon anywhere during the previous 30 days
decreased (from 17% to 13%), as did the percentage of
students who reported carrying a weapon on school
property (decreased from 6% to 3%). In 2019–20, there
were a total of 75 school shootings with casualties,
including 27 school shootings with deaths and 48 school
shootings with injuries only. In addition, there were 37
reported school shootings with no casualties in 2019–20.
|
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of
Justice
|
|
|
The Program for International Student Assessment Young
Adult Follow-up Study (PISA YAFS) follows students who
participated in PISA 2012 in the United States. The study
is designed to measure how performance on PISA 2012
relates to subsequent measures of outcomes and skills of
young adults on an online assessment, education and
skills online. PISA is administered in the United States
every 3 years, and is intended to measure the
mathematics, science, and reading literacy skills of
students who are approaching the end of compulsory
schooling, at approximately age 15 when the majority of
these students are in the 10th grade. The second set of
data needed for the PISA YAFS study was conducted in
2016, approximately 3.5 years after PISA 2012. Data
collected as part of this follow-up study included
information related to skill use, career interests, and
well-being and health. The data is available as a public
use file.
|
Source: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S.
Department of Education
|
|
This paper monetizes the life-cycle intra-generational
and inter-generational benefits of the Perry Preschool
Project, a pioneering high-quality early childhood
education program implemented before Head Start that
targeted disadvantaged African-Americans and was
evaluated by a randomized trial. It has the longest
follow-up of any experimentally evaluated early childhood
education program. The authors follow participants into
late midlife as well as their children into adulthood.
Impacts on the original participants and their children
generate substantial benefits. The authors use long-run
measures of intervention outcomes to assess the validity
of current, widely used procedures of forecasting
life-cycle earnings using cognitive-test scores measured
at early ages. The authors find that this approach is
flawed for two reasons: 1) Cognitive-test scores are a
weak reed to lean on. Many other strongly predictive
factors, primarily social and emotional skills, are not
used in this approach; and 2) It ignores a myriad of
other benefits of early intervention besides earnings.
|
Source: National Bureau of Economic Research
|
|
What is the social, emotional, and academic impact of
attending school remotely rather than in person? The
authors address this issue using survey data collected
from 6,576 high school students in a large, diverse
school district that allowed families to choose either
format in fall 2020. Controlling for baseline measures of
well-being collected one month before the onset of the
COVID-19 pandemic as well as demographics, high school
students who attended school remotely reported lower
levels of social, emotional, and academic well-being than
classmates who attended school in person. These
differences were consistent across gender, race and
ethnicity, and socioeconomic status subgroups but
significantly wider among 10th–12th graders than ninth
graders.
|
Source: American Educational Research Association
|
|
|
Millions of mortgage borrowers continue to experience
financial challenges and potential housing instability
during the COVID-19 pandemic. To address these concerns,
Congress, federal agencies, and the government-sponsored
enterprises Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac provided
borrowers with options to temporarily suspend their
mortgage payments and placed a moratorium on
foreclosures. Both provisions begin to expire in the
coming months. The CARES Act includes a provision for the
authors to monitor federal efforts related to COVID-19.
This report examines (1) the extent to which mortgage
forbearance may have contributed to housing stability
during the pandemic, (2) federal efforts to promote
awareness of forbearance among delinquent borrowers, and
(3) federal efforts to limit mortgage default and
foreclosure risks after federal mortgage forbearance and
foreclosure protections expire. The authors found that
foreclosures declined significantly during the pandemic
because of federal moratoriums that prohibited
foreclosures. The number of mortgages entering
foreclosure decreased by about 85% on a year-over-year
basis from June 2019 to June 2020 and remained as low
through February 2021, according to mortgage data
provider Black Knight.
|
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office
|
|
Applications for new businesses from the U.S. Census
Bureau’s monthly and weekly Business Formation Statistics
fell substantially in the early stages of the pandemic
but then surged in the second half of 2020. This surge
has continued through May 2021. The pace of applications
since mid-2020 is the highest on record (earliest data
available is 2004). The large increase in applications is
for both likely new employers and non-employers. These
patterns contrast sharply with those in the Great
Recession when applications for likely new employer
businesses and in turn actual startups of employer
businesses declined sharply and persistently. Dominant
industries include non-store retail (alone accounting for
33% of the surge), professional, scientific and technical
services, truck transportation, and accommodation and
food services. Given that existing small businesses in
retail trade and accommodation and food services have
suffered especially large declines in the pandemic, these
patterns are consistent with restructuring induced by the
pandemic.
|
Source: National Bureau of Economic Research
|
|
As more states legalize marijuana for full adult
(recreational) use through ballot initiatives or
legislation, policymakers and stakeholders are looking to
better understand the economic, public health, and public
safety impacts of legalization. States legalizing
adult-use marijuana also need to decide how to license
cannabis businesses in a way that is equitable; many
states seek to award licenses to members of communities
that have been disproportionately burdened by the
criminalization of cannabis. Researchers conducted
rigorous mixed-methods analyses of secondary data to help
states anticipate the impacts of cannabis legalization.
The authors also assessed the relationship between the
regulatory environment, such as licensing schemes for
cannabis businesses, and diversity among license holders
to help states achieve an equitable cannabis market.
|
Source: Mathematica
|
|
|
Although virtual health care has been on the horizon for
years, telehealth use exploded in the early days of the
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic—it increased
by more than 4,000% in March 2020 over the previous year,
by some measures. Pre-pandemic policies regarding the
specifics of telehealth service reimbursement, which had
been in place to limit overspending and potential fraud,
were temporarily waived to ease access to care during the
public health emergency. More recently, telehealth use
has leveled off as in-person care has begun to resume.
Policymakers and payers must decide which policy waivers
should remain in place. About 30% of patients used video
telehealth services in the first months of the pandemic,
a survey found. This was a marked increase from the 4% of
patients surveyed in 2019 who used video telehealth
services. Much of this increase was due to patients
seeing their own doctors through telehealth. Being able
to have virtual visits with their usual providers could
affect patients' willingness to participate in
telehealth. During the pandemic, using telehealth to help
patients and providers maintain access has rightly been a
top priority. Concerns about telehealth's effect on
health care spending and quality will arise again as
policymakers begin to look beyond the pandemic. It is
unclear how relevant pre-pandemic studies on cost and
quality will be, given how much telehealth delivery
models have shifted since March 2020. New studies will
especially need to consider the forms of telehealth (such
as audio-only visits and video using less-secure
platforms) that have caught on during the past year.
Policymakers might also want to begin thinking of
telehealth less as an either-or proposition (i.e., either
telehealth or office visits) and more in terms of how the
two modalities can work together in a hybrid format.
|
Source: RAND Corporation
|
|
Housing First is an approach to homelessness that
recognizes housing is a platform for improved health and
other positive outcomes. In 2016, the City and County of
Denver launched the Supportive Housing Social Impact Bond
Initiative, a supportive housing program designed to
serve a chronically homeless population that frequently
cycles in and out of jail. This working paper explores
the health care outcomes of Denver’s Housing First
approach to permanent supportive housing. Over two years,
supportive housing increased
office-based care for psychiatric diagnoses (primarily
reflecting care provided by the supportive housing
providers), decreased emergency department visits, and
increased access to prescription medication.
|
Source: Urban Institute
|
|
This paper investigates the career effects of mental
health, focusing on depression, schizophrenia, and
bipolar disorder. Individual-level registry data from
Denmark show that these disorders carry large earnings
penalties, ranging from 34% for depression and 38%
percent for bipolar disorder to 74% for schizophrenia. To
investigate the causal effects of mental health on a
person’s career, the authors exploit the approval of
lithium as a maintenance treatment for bipolar disorder
in 1976. Baseline estimates compare career outcomes for
people with and without access in their 20s, the typical
age of onset for bipolar disorder. These estimates show
that access to treatment eliminates one third of the
earnings penalty associated with bipolar disorder and
greatly reduces the risks of low or no earnings.
Importantly, access to treatment closes more than half of
the disability risk associated with bipolar disorder.
|
Source: National Bureau of Economic Research
|
N O T E : An online subscription may be required to view some items.
|
|
|
Government Program Summaries (GPS) is a free resource for legislators and the public that provides descriptive information on over 200 state government programs. To provide fiscal data, GPS links to Transparency
Florida, the Legislature's website that includes continually updated information on the state's operating budget and daily expenditures by state agencies.
|
A publication of the Florida Legislature's Office of Program Policy Analysis & Government Accountability
PolicyNotes, published every Friday, features reports, articles, and websites with timely information of interest to policymakers and researchers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations
expressed by third parties as reported in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect OPPAGA's views.
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
PolicyNotes provided that this section is preserved on all copies.
|
|