| 
  
 | 
 
		
         	
	    
      	
      	
      		January 20, 2023
      	
      	 
	     |  	   
 	        	     		  	
 | 
 
	  
               
             
 |  
	
	  
                             
             
             
             
             
             
Federal law and the legal system have long recognized 
crime victims’ rights. Starting in the 1970s, legal 
clinics and other victim services emerged to safeguard 
those rights. The federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act of 
2004 spelled out the rights of crime victims and provided 
resources to protect them. Before that, the Victims’ 
Rights and Restitution Act of 1990 required federal 
agencies to give best efforts to ensure that crime victims 
are treated with fairness and respect and protected from 
those who victimized them, among other rights. Most states 
have adopted their own crime victim protections. New 
research supported by the National Institute of Justice 
identifies a model process to help crime victim legal 
clinics refine their operations in ways that can work best 
for clients. The study also offers a roadmap for 
evaluating whether and how case outcomes are benefiting 
their crime victim clients in meaningful ways. Developing 
more effective legal clinics for crime victims requires 
first understanding what program elements are needed and 
what success would mean for each client. Rarely do victims 
of crime experience clear-cut victories through the court, 
and in many cases, success takes on more intangible forms, 
like feeling respected by the system and having greater 
trust in the legal process. The researchers tested the 
conceptual model at three clinics, helping to build a 
better foundation for determining and monitoring that 
legal clinic’s fidelity to the model. The formative 
evaluation also assessed each of the three clinics’ 
overall readiness for the next phases of evaluation, 
including a formal process and outcome evaluation to 
determine whether each clinic was ready and able to assess 
the degree to which program activities are being 
implemented as intended and the program is achieving 
intended outcomes for victims.
           
   
   
 |  
 
      
| 	                       
 
             
             
             
             Source: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice
            
 
 |  
	  
               
             
 |  
	
	  
                             
             
             
             
             
             
This January 2023 issuereports on the funding and 
technical assistance being provided by the U.S. Office of 
Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) for 
youth mentoring programs, which provide participating 
youth a relationship with a caring adult who can provide 
the youth guidance and support. From 2017 through the 
first half of 2021, OJJDP-funded programs recruited 
143,000 new mentors and served over 971,000 youths 
nationwide. Through the Mentoring Opportunities for Youth 
Initiative, OJJDP funds one-on-one, group, and peer 
mentoring services to youth who are at high risk for 
involvement with the juvenile justice system, including 
youth impacted by opioids and those on probation. In 
addition, grants awarded under this program enable 
mentoring organizations to provide comprehensive support 
services and interventions for youth who are at risk of or 
who are victims of child sexual exploitation, domestic sex 
trafficking, or labor trafficking. Between Fiscal Years 
2020 and 2022, OJJDP awarded more than $262 million to 
increase mentoring opportunities for youth and to improve 
the quality of the mentoring they receive.
            
   
   
 |  
 
      
| 	                       
 
             
             
             
             Source: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs 
            
 
 |  
	  
               
             
 |  
	
	  
                             
             
             
             
             
             
The advent of blockchain-based technologies has opened a 
new frontier for individuals wishing to conduct financial 
and other transactions remotely, anonymously, and without 
the need for a third party like a bank. Blockchain 
technology has various uses but is perhaps best known as 
the foundation for a certain type of digital currency 
called cryptocurrency. Cryptocurrency is increasingly an 
accepted form of payment in many legitimate business 
transactions, but it is also used to facilitate many 
illegal activities, in large part because of its capacity 
to facilitate mostly anonymous transactions remotely. As a 
result, law enforcement investigators need to develop new 
skills, competencies, and tools for ensuring justice. 
Researchers conducted a workshop with law enforcement 
practitioners, academics, and other experts. Workshop 
participants identified and prioritized 24 research and 
development needs that, if invested in, would improve law 
enforcement's ability to adapt to these societal changes. 
These needs pertain to policies for digital key 
management, resources for law enforcement training on 
blockchain and cryptocurrency, and tools for 
investigations involving cryptocurrency. In this report, 
the researchers detail the proceedings of the workshop, 
discuss the ten highest-priority needs identified by the 
participants, and provide additional context based on the 
participants' discussions. The participants prioritized 
needs associated with raising the level of knowledge for 
officers and investigators, training or hiring experts who 
can assist with investigations, and adapting existing 
policies and procedures to ensure that cryptocurrencies 
are handled responsibly. A major finding from the workshop 
is that there are not enough law enforcement–specific 
blockchain and cryptocurrency training and experts to meet 
the demand for educating justice practitioners. 
Recommendations include identify best-practice policies 
and procedures for handling, storing, transferring, and 
redacting digital cryptocurrency keys within 
record-management systems, and to develop regional or 
national sharing systems that facilitate sharing of 
training materials and actionable intelligence for ongoing 
cases.
            
   
   
 |  
 
      
| 	                       
 
             
             
             
             Source: Rand Corporation 
            
 
 |  
         
   	
 |  
 
               
	           
 	  
 |  
	                            
              
              
              
              
			  
			  
Substantial misrepresentation occurs when a college makes 
certain false or misleading statements—or omissions—about 
its programs, costs, or graduate employment, that students 
or others could rely on to their detriment. The U.S. 
Department of Education  is responsible for enforcing a 
prohibition against colleges making these types of 
statements, when it determines they meet the definition of 
“substantial misrepresentation”. The U.S. Government 
Accountability Office (GAO) reviewed the department’s 
oversight and enforcement of this prohibition. The GAO 
analysis showed that the department imposed penalties for 
substantial misrepresentation on 13 colleges from Fiscal 
years 2016 through 2021. Penalties included ending their 
participation in federal student aid programs or levying 
fines. However, the department has not completed written 
procedures for investigating colleges and has not updated 
its written procedures for imposing penalties for 
substantial misrepresentation. The GAO recommends that the 
department (1) complete written procedures for substantial 
misrepresentation investigations, including for selecting 
colleges and conducting investigations; and (2) update 
written procedures for imposing penalties, as appropriate, 
on colleges that engaged in substantial misrepresentation.
             
                
 |  
   
| 	  
 
              
              
              Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office
                            
               
 |  
 
	           
 	  
 |  
	                            
              
              
              
              
			  
			  
Using interview, survey, and other data gathered from 
several colleges through virtual site visits, this report 
discusses early implementation and outcome findings from a 
study of the Caring Campus/Faculty program conducted in 
2020-2022. Caring Campus/Faculty is currently implemented 
in 28 colleges nationwide, and brings together a group of 
college faculty and involves them in coaching sessions 
during which they identify behavioral commitments that can 
be employed in the classroom to increase students’ 
connection to the college. These faculty then engage with 
other instructors at their college to expand the number 
who are willing to employ the commitments. The report 
findings indicate that Caring Campus/Faculty has the 
potential to provide meaningful support to students who 
may need help and encouragement to persist in college. 
Such support may be crucial for students of color, 
first-generation students, and low-income students to 
navigate college well. The findings also suggest that 
Caring Campus/Faculty is becoming a key avenue for faculty 
to take leadership in student success efforts and that it 
is working to support faculty as they seek to improve 
their ability to teach and support students.
             
                
 |  
   
| 	  
 
              
              
              Source: Community College Research Center
                            
               
 |  
 
	           
 	  
 |  
	                            
              
              
              
              
			  
			  
Stakeholders in the public and private sectors in Vermont 
have been increasing the state's investments in 
high-quality early care and education (ECE) programs for 
children not yet in kindergarten. Yet many families are 
not reached by the funds currently available, especially 
to afford care for infants and toddlers. Additionally, the 
ECE workforce has long been underpaid, both in terms of 
cash wages and benefits. Further expansion of public funds 
to ensure that young children can participate in 
high-quality ECE in the mixed-delivery system (both public 
and private providers) requires an understanding of the 
cost of high-quality ECE, what is a reasonable 
contribution families can make to the cost of the ECE they 
consume, and the potential public-sector revenue options 
to fill the gap. Vermont Act 45, passed in 2021, expressed 
a need to support Vermont's economy by providing access to 
high-quality ECE and ensuring that the state's early 
educators are fairly compensated and well supported. The 
act included a requirement for a financing study. To meet 
this requirement, the authors estimate the cost for 
high-quality ECE in Vermont using a mixed-delivery system. 
In addition, to understand the size of the funding gap 
that must be filled to expand subsidies to more families, 
the authors consider several designs for a sliding-scale 
subsidy schedule. The authors also identify a set of 
feasible and stable revenue streams that can be used alone 
or in combination to fill the funding gap and employ a 
series of economic models to estimate the net fiscal and 
economic impact of the effects of the increased subsidies 
and the identified revenue. Key findings include that 
about 60% of families with pre–school-age children have 
family income below 3.5 times the federal poverty level, 
the maximum income that currently qualifies for ECE 
subsidies, and that about $162 million of the $645 million 
total cost would be paid by families with incomes of more 
than 5.0 times the poverty level, a group that would not 
be subsidized under these schedules. 
             
                
 |  
   
| 	  
 
              
              
              Source: Rand Corporation
                            
               
 |  
 
  
 	
 |  
      
                          
 	  
	
 |  
                              
              
                              
	  
              
              
              
              
Using data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System for 
the period 1983-1997, previous work found that mandatory 
seatbelt laws were associated with a 4%-6% reduction in 
traffic fatalities among motor vehicle occupants. After 
successfully replicating the two-way fixed effects 
estimates in prior work, the authors (1) add 22 years of 
data (1998-2019) to capture additional seatbelt policy 
variation and observe a longer post-treatment period, (2) 
employ a interaction-weighted estimator to address 
potential bias due to heterogeneous and dynamic treatment 
effects, and (3) estimate event-study models to 
investigate pre-treatment trends and explore lagged 
post-treatment effects. Consistent with previous work, 
these updated estimates show that primary seatbelt laws 
are associated with a 5%-9% reduction in fatalities among 
motor vehicle occupants. Estimated effects of secondary 
seatbelt laws are smaller in magnitude and sensitive to 
model choice.
        
  
 |  
  
| 	  
               
              
              
              Source: National Bureau of Economic Research 
              
 
 |  
  
                          
 	  
	
 |  
                              
              
                              
	  
              
              
              
              
Digital transactions offer the opportunity to move money 
faster, cheaper, and more conveniently for customers and 
businesses. However, the current system has a cost 
structure that is expensive for digital micro-payments, 
which are small dollar payments. Furthermore, digital 
payments require accessing digital currency which is easy 
for the wealthy but can be expensive for those with less 
income. Finally, digital payment acceptance is fragmented, 
cumbersome, and slow, creating delays. Transportation 
technology is rapidly evolving in a direction that 
involves greater use of micro-payments which exposes many 
problems in America’s payment system. This paper lays out 
the challenges inherent in scaling up open payments in the 
public transportation context and begins to outline 
potential paths for solutions. The paper provides an 
overview of the current landscape of transit payments and 
the specific issues involved in moving toward open 
payments from the perspective of public transit agencies. 
The paper concludes with a potential path for solutions, 
including steps such as providing lower interchange costs 
for transit in debit and credit card systems and 
considering a broader set of factors when transit agencies 
make decisions to move from closed loop systems like 
prepaid fare cards to open loop systems which are directly 
connected to personal accounts such as credit or debit 
cards.
        
  
 |  
  
| 	  
               
              
              
              Source: Brookings Institute
              
 
 |  
                          
 	  
	
 |  
                              
              
                              
	  
              
              
              
              
The Hartford is a Fortune 500 insurance and investment 
company headquartered in Hartford, Connecticut, which 
employs more than 18,000 people company wide. It has a 
large workers’ compensation business, ranked 2nd in the 
nation based on direct written premium.. Workers’ 
compensation is insurance that provides coverage in the 
form of cash payments or medical care for workers who are 
injured on the job. Recently, the company discovered that 
a significant proportion of claims that were made through 
the workers’ compensation department were relatively 
simple claims that required only coverage for medications 
or medical care and not more complex areas such as lost 
wages or time off work. This area represented a prime 
opportunity for automation, where work previously done by 
a claim administrator would instead be automated using 
custom-build computer algorithms, freeing up staff members 
to do more complex work. They determined that some claims 
processes could be automated, eliminating multiple human 
touchpoints without sacrificing compliance or customer 
outcomes. As with other automation efforts, artificial 
intelligence (AI) often creates significant financial 
returns and efficiency gains, giving work previously done 
by humans to a machine. Unlike many automation efforts, 
though, The Hartford did not find savings through 
eliminating workforce. Rather, they took the opportunity 
created by the automation and reformed roles to fill 
different business needs, enabling the entire workers’ 
compensation department to handle more, and more 
efficiently. While bottom-line results are still being 
determined, the company is handling more claims, and more 
efficiently than before, with workers empowered to use 
their new skills. It is also a positive story, where staff 
members kept jobs that were enhanced rather than replaced 
by automation.
        
  
 |  
  
| 	  
               
              
              
              Source: Aspen Institute
              
 
 |  
  
   	
 |  
 
              
 	                                     
              
 |  
                              
     
                                            
	  
              
              
              
               
This report presents national estimates of people living 
in families having problems paying medical bills by 
selected sociodemographic and geographic characteristics, 
including sex, race and Hispanic origin, family income, 
health insurance coverage status, education level, 
urbanization level, region, and state Medicaid expansion 
status. Data from the 2019, 2020, and 2021 National Health 
Interview Survey (NHIS) were used to estimate short-term 
trends in problems paying medical bills in the past 12 
months. Data from the 2021 NHIS were used to describe 
estimates of people who were in families who have problems 
paying medical bills by selected sociodemographic and 
geographic characteristics. Overall, the percentage of 
people who were in families having problems paying medical 
bills in the past 12 months decreased from 14% in 2019 to 
10.8% in 2021. In 2021, males (9.7%) were less likely than 
females (11.8%) to have problems paying medical bills. The 
percentage of people who were in families having problems 
paying medical bills was higher among children aged 0–17 
years (11.5%) and adults aged 18–64 (11.3%) than adults 
aged 65 and over (7.7%). Among people under age 65 and 
those aged 65 and over, the percentage who were in 
families having problems paying medical bills varied by 
health insurance coverage status, family income, and state 
Medicaid expansion status.
          
  
 |  
 
               
| 	  
               
              
              
              Source: National Center for Health Statistics      
 
 |  
 
              
              
 	                                     
              
 |  
                              
     
                                            
	  
              
              
              
               
This guide highlights strategies for behavioral health and 
housing providers to conduct outreach and engage with 
individuals experiencing homelessness, initiate use of 
behavioral health treatment as they wait to receive stable 
housing and retain them in their recovery efforts once 
housed. The guide focuses on five programs and practices 
that have demonstrated success in improving mental health 
and substance use outcomes during the often-lengthy period 
of homelessness prior to housing placement. These 
practices include medications for opioid use disorder, 
motivational interviewing, intensive case management, 
community reinforcement approach, including adolescent 
community reinforcement approach, and peer support. The 
guide includes both the evidence of the impact of these 
interventions and specific strategies for providers, 
staff, and organizations to consider when implementing 
them. Specifically, the guide notes that organizations 
should consider engaging community partners, securing 
sustainable funding streams, building a strong workforce, 
reducing barriers to treatment engagement and retention, 
and evaluating effectiveness.
          
  
 |  
 
               
| 	  
               
              
              
              Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration    
 
 |  
              
 	                                     
              
 |  
                              
     
                                            
	  
              
              
              
               
The COVID-19 pandemic has been especially challenging for 
American families with children. The children’s mental 
health crisis, caused by school closures, social 
isolation, grief over lost community and family members, 
and challenges accessing needed care as contributing 
factors. Parents, and especially mothers, have also borne 
significant caregiving, health, and health care access 
burdens that likely contributed to observed increases in 
mental health challenges since the pandemic began. Women 
and mothers were already facing significant mental health 
challenges before the pandemic, and those challenges are 
likely to persist and evolve as the most acute pandemic 
stressors subside and new threats to women’s health and 
well-being arise. To better support the mental health and 
well-being of mothers and children in the aftermath of the 
pandemic, it is important to understand the patterns that 
existed before the crisis. This report analyzes national 
patterns of self-reported symptoms of anxiety and 
depression among custodial mothers of children younger 
than 18. The authors found that in 2019, 13.5% of mothers 
ages 19 to 64, or about 4.9 million mothers, reported 
symptoms of moderate or severe anxiety, and 4.8%, or about 
1.7 million mothers, reported symptoms of moderate or 
severe depression. About 1.2 million mothers experienced 
both moderate or severe anxiety and depression. The 
findings indicate that many mothers reported symptoms of 
anxiety and depression even before increases in the 
stressors facing American families, including the COVID-19 
pandemic. The authors conclude that mental health coverage 
could be improved with changes to network adequacy 
standards, provider payment rates, covered benefits and 
cost-sharing policies, and scope of practice regulations; 
enforcement of mental health parity regulations; and 
increasing the size of the behavioral health workforce. In 
addition, broader policy interventions including universal 
early education and care, paid parental leave, pay equity, 
and flexible workplace policies could help relieve some of 
the social factors that can contribute to maternal anxiety 
and depression.
          
  
 |  
 
               
| 	  
               
              
              
              Source: Urban Institute     
 
 |  
              
 	                                     
              
 |  
                              
     
                                            
	  
              
              
              
               
Applying for federal safety net programs is often 
confusing, burdensome, and stigmatizing for families in 
need of immediate assistance to access food, housing, 
health care, and other essentials. This brief used 
nationally representative data from the Urban Institute’s 
Well-Being and Basic Needs Survey to examine the customer 
service and enrollment experiences of nonelderly adults 
who reported their families applied for or participated in 
one or more safety net programs in 2021. The authors also 
examined experiences with the two programs with the 
largest enrollment, Medicaid/the Children’s Health 
Insurance Program (CHIP) and the Supplemental Nutrition 
Assistance Program (SNAP), among groups that have 
experienced long-standing inequities by focusing on 
differences by race, ethnicity, disability status, and 
history of diagnosed mental health conditions. Customer 
service and enrollment experiences varied widely across 
programs. For instance, the share of adults reporting that 
program staff never or only sometimes treated them or 
their family members with courtesy and respect was highest 
for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and 
unemployment insurance (41.0% and 38.2%, respectively) and 
lowest for Medicaid/CHIP (18.1%). More than 4 in 10 adults 
reported one or more enrollment difficulties with 
unemployment insurance, TANF, and SNAP, such as trouble 
with determining eligibility, providing required 
documentation, and getting benefits when needed. About 3 
in 10 adults reported enrollment difficulties for 
Medicaid/CHIP, Supplemental Security Income, Social 
Security Disability Insurance, and rental assistance 
programs.
          
  
 |  
 
               
| 	  
               
              
              
              Source: Urban Institute     
 
 |  
                       
                          
		  
            
           N O T E :  An online subscription may be required to view some items. 
            
            
        
              	    
 |  
       
                                       
 |        
|         
            
           
           
 |  
  
                      
  |        
|         
           
 |  
       
                                       
 |        
        
           
               
                  
                         
           
           Government Program Summaries (GPS) is a free resource for legislators and the public that provides descriptive information on over 200 state government programs. To provide fiscal data, GPS links to Transparency 
           Florida, the Legislature's website that includes continually updated information on the state's operating budget and daily expenditures by state agencies.
             
           
            
 |  
 
  
                      
            
               
                         
           
           
           A publication of the Florida Legislature's Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. 
		   Click  here to subscribe to this publication.
           As a joint legislative unit, OPPAGA works with both the 
		   Senate and the House of Representatives to conduct 
		   objective research, program reviews, and contract 
		   management for the Florida Legislature. 
           
            
           PolicyNotes, published every Friday, features reports, articles, and websites with timely information of interest to policymakers and researchers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations 
           expressed by third parties as reported in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect OPPAGA's views. 
            
           
           
           Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of 
		   PolicyNotes provided that this section is preserved on all copies.            
		    
		    
		   
           
	        
 |  	
 
 
 |