|
|
December 12, 2025
|
|
|
This web-only report provides preliminary statistics on key
items from the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics’ Annual
Survey of Jails and Census of Jails. The jail statistics
presented include the number of persons held in local jails
by inmate demographics and conviction status, the number of
jail admissions, and jail incarceration rates, from 2014 to
2024. At midyear 2024, local jails held 657,500 persons in
custody, similar to the year before (664,200). In the same
period, 45% of individuals incarcerated in local jails were
White, 38% were Black, and 15% were Hispanic. In addition,
69% of the jail population (450,600) was awaiting court
action on a current charge or being held in jail for other
reasons. The remaining 31% (206,900) were convicted and
either serving a sentence or awaiting sentencing on a
conviction. From July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, local jails
reported 7.9 million admissions. While this represents a 4%
increase over the 7.6 million admissions the year before,
annual admissions were 31% lower than 10 years ago (11.5
million).
|
|
Source: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics
|
|
According to national data, law enforcement solved fewer
than half of all violent crimes that came to their attention
in 2023. Although there are no national data on court
outcomes in violent crime cases, these statistics would
likely equally demonstrate the criminal legal system’s
limited ability to address violent crime. One known barrier
to successful outcomes in violent crime cases is a lack of
participation in the criminal legal system by victims and
witnesses of these crimes. This is especially true in crimes
of severe community violence, which is the focus of this
study. By speaking with recent victims and witnesses of
severe community violence and criminal legal system actors
and community service provider professionals who work with
victims and witnesses of severe community violence in the
Piedmont Triad region of North Carolina, the research team
seeks to understand the lack of victim and witness
participation and to inform solutions for increasing and
improving victim and witness criminal legal system
participation in the region. The research team identified
several barriers and needs that can be addressed to promote
criminal legal system participation, including better
resourcing criminal legal system agencies to support and
protect victims and witnesses by employing victim advocates,
increasing safety protections, and by improving trust
between residents and the criminal legal system. In addition
to increasing criminal legal system participation by victims
and witnesses of these crimes, these measures are likely to
address the extensive amount of unresolved trauma the
research team identified that has been caused by victims and
witnesses experiencing these crimes without adequate
services and support.
|
|
Source: RTI International
|
|
|
The strategies outlined in this guide are based on the
foundational work of the 10 Unlocking Opportunity pilot
colleges. The eight strategies outlined here offer community
colleges practical ways to increase the post-completion
value of credentials, accelerate bachelor’s attainment, and
expand access to good jobs—all with the ultimate goal of
advancing economic mobility and talent development in the
regions that community colleges serve. The research team is
energized by these innovations and are even more excited
about what the research team will learn next. As the
Unlocking Opportunity network expands from 10 to 65
community colleges in the coming year, the research team
will continue to share findings, tools, and examples from
colleges implementing these (and other emerging) approaches
at scale and refining strategies with partners across the
field. Most importantly, the research team hope all college
leaders will act to unlock more economic opportunities for
many more students. Three steps matter most. The first step
is, analyzing programs and program outcomes by using labor
market, transfer, and outcomes data to classify programs by
post-completion value and identify gaps and opportunities.
The next is identifying opportunities and setting
strategies. This can begin by prioritizing a small set of
large-scale reforms with the greatest potential impact in
your context. Then, the last step is to set clear targets
and align leadership, resources, and partnerships to meet
them through focusing on program value. Actions include
redesigning program offerings so that more students enter
pathways that reliably lead to living-wage jobs and
bachelor’s completion.
|
|
Source: Community College Research Center
|
|
Investing in the education of all children is not only a
long-standing moral imperative but also an increasingly
strategic economic decision, particularly in light of the
nation’s need to equip all children to contribute to its
future prosperity. The empirical evidence is clear:
educational investments at scale would yield substantial
public returns. And while the monetary metrics are
compelling, it is the vision of a more just and prosperous
society—with reduced inequality, a more dynamic economy, and
enhanced well-being—that truly underscores the enduring
value of such investments. Pursuing an equity-centered
agenda, at scale, that improves educational opportunities
and outcomes for all individuals would present an
opportunity to activate the potential of the growing
majorities. This choice would not only address long-standing
inequities but also yield substantial net benefits for the
nation as a whole. The simulations for the gains to the
taxpayer to improving education participation and outcomes
for Black and Hispanic children, bringing them closer to the
levels of White children, suggest increased net benefits
ranging from $20.2 to $72.6 billion per year. For example,
increasing early childhood education enrollment rates of
Black and Hispanic children to the level of White children
would lead to about 136,000 additional children enrolled in
early childhood education per year, and to an increased net
benefit to the general public of about $40.9 billion per
year.
|
|
Source: Learning Policy Institute
|
|
The U.S. military has a long-standing commitment to
investing in accessible, affordable, and high-quality child
care services for its active component, reserve components,
and civilian personnel. In support of this objective, the
U.S. Department of War’s Child Development Program (CDP)
represents the largest employer-sponsored child care system
in the country. However, in recent years, the CDP has
struggled to meet the demand for child care, a trend that
predates the coronavirus disease pandemic and reflects the
challenges of recruiting and retaining a qualified
workforce. As of 2022, active-duty members had 750,000
children under age 13, the age group eligible for care.
Close to half of these children are under age 5. In March
2020, the CDP met about 81% of child care demand. By
December 2022, the CDP only met 74% of child care demand.
This decrease in meeting needs occurred despite a relatively
stable capacity and falling enrollment. The pandemic reduced
demand but did not reduce it enough to bring supply and
demand back into alignment. The pandemic actually reduced
the CDP’s effective capacity because of the drop in the
workforce size, leaving centers with classrooms that they
could not staff. Child Development Program staff are almost
universally female and are predominantly military spouses
(30% of direct care staff). The majority of the workforce
identifies as non-white. CDP direct care staff’s pay,
benefits, and working conditions are not necessarily
competitive with alternatives in the labor market—including
for military spouses, who now have more remote work options.
Twenty percent of new entry cohorts leave their CDP jobs
within three months. Fifty percent of new entrants leave
after the first year. The high rates of attrition appear to
be positively linked to staff members’ education levels,
average wages in the local labor market, and employment in
the period after the onset of the pandemic.
|
|
Source: RAND Corporation
|
|
|
Micromobility options, including shared bicycles and
e-scooters, are increasingly popular in Florida and other
parts of the United States. These modes of transportation
are ideal for short trips and serve as vital connections to
public transit systems. However, the state lacks a
standardized framework to analyze micromobility usage,
assess safety issues, and understand how these systems
interact with public transit. This report analyzes (1)
micromobility usage patterns and determines the factors
influencing them, (2) evaluates the relationship between
micromobility and public transit with a focus on
accessibility and ridership impacts, and (3) examines crash
data statewide to identify patterns, underlying causes, and
street characteristics that contribute to non-motorist
accidents. Researchers found that micromobility usage tends
to peak during certain times and in specific neighborhoods.
Although these systems enhance access to public transit,
their overall impact on increasing ridership is limited.
Additionally, higher levels of micromobility usage were
linked to a greater likelihood of crashes, particularly on
streets without infrastructure like bike lanes. Researchers
provide several recommendations for improving micromobility
systems, including enhancing bike lane infrastructure.
|
|
Source: Florida Department of Transportation Research Center
|
|
The Hutchins Center Fiscal Impact Measure (FIM) shows how
much local, state, and federal tax and spending policies
increase or decrease overall economic growth, and provides a
near-term forecast of fiscal policies’ effects on economic
activity. The measure shows that fiscal policy appears to
have decreased U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) growth, the
total monetary value of all finished goods and services
produced within the U.S., by 0.2 percentage points in the
third quarter of 2025. The negative forecast for the third
quarter reflects boosts from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act
(OBBBA) and the delayed effects of the Inflation Reduction
Act on equipment spending, offset by the direct effects of
tariffs and the effects of uncertainty related to tariffs
and other government funding. Researchers expect fiscal
policy to lower GDP growth by 1.5 percentage points in the
fourth quarter of 2025, largely reflecting the temporary
effects of the government shutdown. However, fiscal policy
is projected to boost GDP growth by about 2.8 percentage
points in the first quarter of 2026 as delayed federal
spending resumes. Lastly, in the forecast period, tariffs and
uncertainty lower real GDP growth, while the OBBBA boosts
it. The underlying FIM—excluding the supply side effects of
recent policies and the effects of the OBBBA, tariffs, and
uncertainty—is moderately restrictive in 2026.
|
|
Source: Brookings Institution
|
|
Motor vehicle crashes are a leading cause of death and
serious injuries for adults and children in the U.S. To
support its mission of saving lives, the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) develops and
implements educational, engineering, and enforcement
programs to prevent tragedies associated with crashes. The
National Occupant Protection Use Survey and the National
Survey of the Use of Booster Seats are designed to provide
the information needed to guide NHTSA’s efforts in meeting
the challenges in reducing motor vehicle crashes. Survey
results show that seat belt use has increased. The national
estimate of seat belt use by adult front-seat passengers in
2022 was 91.6%, compared to 84.1% in 2009. Survey results
also show that restraint use for all children under 13 was
89.8% in 2021, although not statistically different than the
2019 estimate of 87.9%.
|
|
Source: Westat
|
|
|
This report presents complete period life tables for each of
the 50 states and the District of Columbia by sex based on
age-specific death rates in 2022. Data used to prepare the
2022 state-specific life tables include: 2022 final
mortality statistics; July 1, 2022, population estimates
based on the Blended Base population estimates produced by
the U.S. Census Bureau; and 2022 Medicare data for people
ages 66–99. Among the 50 states and D.C., Hawaii had the
highest life expectancy at birth, 80.0 years in 2022, and
West Virginia had the lowest, 72.2 years. From 2021 to 2022,
life expectancy increased for 48 states and D.C. and
decreased for 2 states (Maine and Vermont). In 2022, life
expectancy at age 65 ranged from 16.6 years in West Virginia
to 20.5 years in Hawaii. Life expectancy at birth was higher
for females in all states and D.C. The difference in life
expectancy between females and males ranged from 3.6 years
in Utah to 6.9 years in New Mexico.
|
|
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
|
|
This report describes changes in total, early, and late
fetal mortality between 2023 and 2024, as well as fetal
mortality by maternal race and Hispanic origin and state of
residence. Comparisons are made with findings from 2022 to
2023. Data are based on reports of fetal death filed in the
50 states and the District of Columbia and collected via the
National Vital Statistics System. In this report, only fetal
deaths reported at 20 weeks of gestation or more are
included. Data for 2022 and 2023 are final and data for 2024
are provisional. From 2023 to 2024, the overall fetal
mortality rate declined 2%, from 5.53 to 5.41 fetal deaths
at 20 weeks of gestation or more per 1,000 live births and
fetal deaths. During this time, the early fetal mortality
rate (20–27 weeks of gestation) was essentially unchanged
(2.88 in 2024), while the late fetal mortality rate (28
weeks of gestation or more) declined 4% (2.55 in 2024). No
significant changes in fetal mortality rates between 2023
and 2024 were observed among the race and Hispanic-origin
groups. Fetal mortality rates decreased in 3 states
(Colorado, Mississippi, and Utah), increased in 1 state (New
Jersey), and were not significantly different in 46 states
and the District of Columbia from 2023 to 2024. In
comparison, from 2022 to 2023, the fetal mortality rate
increased for early fetal deaths, for Asian non-Hispanic
women, and in five state (Colorado, Indiana, Maryland, New
Jersey, and Utah) and declined in one state (Tennessee).
|
|
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
|
|
Many people with disabilities need personal care services to
support their full participation in the labor force and
community. Yet personal care services are generally not
covered by employer-based health insurance, Marketplace
plans, or Medicare. Medicaid is the only major source of
health insurance that includes coverage of personal care
services and other long-term services and supports, which
can be critical for persons with disabilities. The Medicaid
program can also provide such services in home and
community-based settings rather than institutional settings,
which is key to supporting the employment of workers with
disabilities. However, Medicaid income and asset eligibility
thresholds mean that some persons with disabilities who are
employed may not qualify. Medicaid Buy-In (MBI) programs for
working people with disabilities were first established
following legislation passed by Congress in the late 1990s.
The legislation aimed to encourage employment among adults
with disabilities by allowing them to maintain Medicaid
coverage despite increased earnings. The research team finds
that 218,000 people would newly enroll in Medicaid under
such a program. New enrollees would come from metropolitan
and rural areas of the country and would represent all races
and ethnicities. Enrollment would increase in every state.
The research team also estimated that new enrollees would
see increases in taxable wages of $947 per year at the
median and $1,720 per year on average. Wage increases
represent increased hours of work, promotions, and increased
opportunities for people with disabilities. Net total
spending for the federal government would amount to $311
million in 2025, which represents offsetting savings of
about two-thirds of the gross cost. While new federal
spending would occur in Medicaid ($838 million) and Medicare
($46 million) and offsetting savings results from reductions
in Supplemental Security Income ($219 million), increased
revenue from income and payroll taxes ($156 million),
reductions in premium tax credits ($148 million), SNAP ($28
million), and uncompensated care ($21 million). Net total
spending for state governments would amount to $516 million
in 2025, which includes offsetting savings of about 5%t of
the gross cost since there are fewer offsets at the state
level. New state funding for Medicaid ($546 million) would
be offset by reductions in uncompensated care ($13 million).
|
|
Source: Urban Institute
|
N O T E : An online subscription may be required to view some items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Program Summaries (GPS) provides descriptive information on Florida state agencies, including funding, contact information, and references to other sources of agency information.
|
A publication of the Florida Legislature's Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.
Click here to subscribe to this publication.
As a joint legislative unit, OPPAGA works with both the
Senate and the House of Representatives to conduct
objective research, program reviews, and contract
management for the Florida Legislature.
PolicyNotes, published every Friday, features reports, articles, and websites with timely information of interest to policymakers and researchers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations
expressed by third parties as reported in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect OPPAGA's views.
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
PolicyNotes provided that this section is preserved on all copies.
|
|