|
|
June 19, 2026
|
|
|
The U.S. faces multiple challenges related to illicit drugs
and has declared the opioid epidemic a national public
health emergency since 2017. The federal Office of National
Drug Control Policy’s (ONDCP) Drug-Free Communities (DFC)
Support Program provides grants for community-based
coalitions focused on drug use prevention efforts for youth
18 and under. The program’s 2025 evaluation report claims
that the DFC program is meeting its strategic goal of
reducing substance use among youth. However, that report
states that it is not possible to establish a causal
relationship between substance use changes in communities
and the DFC program. The Government Accountability Office
found significant limitations in the program
data—inconsistencies and unclear data sources. Moreover,
ONDCP’s cross-site evaluations have not transparently
described its methodologies. Including the complete
methodology would allow one to better understand and assess
the results of the evaluation. ONDCP has taken some steps to
effectively administer the DFC program, including working to
ensure new coalitions meet program requirements and have
access to mandatory training. In addition, ONDCP has
established an internal controls framework to help ensure
grantee compliance. However, ONDCP has not consistently
enforced compliance with the statutory requirement that DFC
coalitions maintain the involvement of all community
sectors. Establishing and maintaining community drug
prevention partnerships is a critical factor to the success
of the DFC program. Further, ONDCP lacks transparency in its
budget process. Enhanced budget disclosures would allow
appropriators and program decision-makers to develop a more
comprehensive understanding of the DFC program’s financial
position.
|
|
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office
|
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania has experienced a dramatic
decline in violent crime in recent years. The city recorded
60% fewer homicides in 2025 than just four years earlier.
And property crimes, though historically high, are down
since their peak in 2023. But contrary to these citywide
trends, crime is not decreasing in every neighborhood, and
even in the neighborhoods where crime is down, the rate
varies. This report analyzes recent changes in violent and
property crime, highlighting how local conditions, physical
environment, and public investment shape neighborhood-level
safety. Key findings include that the Point Breeze
neighborhood is largely made up of areas where the crime
rate is lower than the city’s average, with a 21% decrease
in crime from 2019 to 2025. However, researchers found that
crime in Point Breeze is not evenly distributed. Areas along
and near Point Breeze and Washington avenues’ business
corridors recorded a relatively high concentration of crime.
Meanwhile, Washington Square stands out by being one of the
few areas near Point Breeze Avenue with a relatively low
concentration of crime. Conversely, while citywide crime
decreased from 2019 to 2025, crime in the Spring Garden
neighborhood increased by 20% during the same period. Crime
is concentrated along Fairmount Avenue near 24th Street,
near the community garden and Roberto Clemente Playground,
and all along Broad Street. Like other parts of the city,
much of the crime is concentrated near or along business
corridors and along major transit lines.
|
|
Source: Pew Research Center
|
|
Policymakers have long sought to promote employment among
released prisoners through policies and programs that reduce
incarceration and broaden access to the labor market. This
descriptive report provides previously unavailable
information about employment before, during, and after
incarceration for about 170,000 people released from
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
prisons between 2015 and 2019, with the aim of highlighting
opportunities for improvement. Key findings include that
one-quarter of people had no record of working—before,
during, or after prison. Specifically, four in ten held a
job before prison, and 44% were employed afterward.
Conversely, 52% held a prison job. Pretrial and
post-sentencing incarceration explain why many in the
release cohort did not have jobs outside prison. Researchers
also found that before prison, one-third of people worked
temp jobs; after prison, 42% did. Most prison jobs involved
unskilled labor, lasted about a month, and supported prison
operations, such as cleaning and food services. Before
prison, just 28% of working people had earnings above the
poverty threshold ($20,200 in 2023) in at least one year.
After prison, that share grew to 45%. While pre-prison
employment-rate disparities narrowed after prison, earnings
disparities persisted: men earned 20% more than women, and
Black people earned 38% less than White people, on average.
People who worked before prison were 9 times more likely to
have a job afterward; each quarter of pre-prison employment
was associated with a 42% increase. Lastly, participants in
prison-based college courses, vocational trades, and
substance-use disorder treatment were more likely than
nonparticipants to have jobs after release.
|
|
Source: Public Policy Institute of California
|
|
|
Social-emotional learning programs have shown promising
short-term results, but much less is known about whether
early gains last through high school and the transition to
college. The INSIGHTS into Children’s Temperament (INSIGHTS)
program is a two-year early social-emotional learning
intervention grounded in temperament theory delivered in
kindergarten and first grade in New York City public
schools. This approach is based on the idea that children
do their best when their specific traits match the demands
of their school and home lives. Key findings of this
long-term follow-up study include that of the full sample of
students, INSIGHTS did not produce detectable impacts on
high school outcomes, such as ninth-grade on-track status,
attendance, grade retention, special education
classification, or receipt of a New York State high school
diploma. A separate analysis of enrollment in a
postsecondary institution in the year after the students’
expected high school graduation found that INSIGHTS students
were less likely to enroll. Exploratory subgroup analyses
for students from families with low incomes and students
whose parents consented to the study did not show sustained
benefits through high school. The modest academic advantages
previously seen in middle school for students from families
with low incomes did not extend to high school. These
findings suggest that a short-term social-emotional learning
intervention in the early grades, even one that is well
designed, well implemented, and initially effective, may not
be enough on its own to change students’ long-term
educational trajectories.
|
|
Source: MDRC
|
|
Approximately one in four college students face food
insecurity, which is associated with negative health and
academic outcomes. As the largest public nutritional program
in the United States, the federal Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) is one important resource that
states and colleges can use to support low-income college
students. Yet SNAP eligibility rules for college students
are complex, and only a small proportion of eligible
students participate. This report aims to inform
decision-makers at the federal, state, and local levels who
are considering efforts to expand SNAP participation among
college students. Key findings include that in 2024, nearly
one in ten college students in Colorado (19,400 students)
participated in SNAP. Only 37% of those who were likely to
be eligible for SNAP participated. Federal or state
eligibility expansions would have the largest impact on
college student SNAP participation. Federal eligibility
changes could increase Colorado college students’ SNAP
participation rates by up to 2.5 percentage points (5,300
students). State-level eligibility changes could increase
participation by approximately 1.6 percentage points (3,300
students). Outreach and case management support for
currently eligible students would have more modest impacts.
By combining state eligibility expansions with outreach and
case management, Colorado could increase SNAP participation
rates by approximately 2 percentage points (more than 4,000
students). Even with changes to eligibility, outreach, and
case management support, many eligible college students will
not participate, suggesting that a variety of approaches may
be necessary to address college student food insecurity.
|
|
Source: RAND Corporation
|
|
|
U.S. military readiness depends on service members who are
prepared to serve when called. The federal Uniformed
Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA)
seeks to protect the civilian careers of service members by
ensuring that they are not disadvantaged in their employment
because of their military obligations. Under USERRA, service
members are entitled to be reemployed in the civilian jobs
they left to serve in the uniformed service. However, some
service members have faced challenges retaining or resuming
their civilian employment. The U.S. Department of Labor's
Veterans' Employment and Training Service (VETS) closed
5,433 complaints from Fiscal Year 2021 through Fiscal Year
2025 with the number of complaints increasing each year to a
high of 1,380 in Fiscal Year 2025. That same year VETS
experienced a 23% reduction in its complaint investigation
staffing levels. During this period, VETS closed USERRA
complaints within 90 days on average, the general time frame
specified in statute. Most complaints were closed for
administrative reasons, including a service member choosing
not to pursue the complaint, or were not substantiated by
the evidence. VETS investigations staff expressed concern
about the amount of time spent on complaints ineligible for
USERRA coverage. From Fiscal Year 2021 through Fiscal Year
2025, “not eligible” and “not substantiated” complaints
represented about 10% (540 of 5,433 complaints) and about
30% (1,632 of 5,433 complaints) of total closed complaints,
respectively. VETS provides numerous resources on its
website to help educate service members, but investigations
staff said the resources are inadequate because they are
optional. By reviewing existing resources and identifying
and implementing options to streamline or modify them, VETS
could help service members better understand their
eligibility under USERRA before submitting complaints and
the standards required to demonstrate that an adverse
employer action constitutes a violation.
|
|
Source: U.S. Government Accountability Office
|
|
Homeowner and rental vacancy rates are important measures of
the health of housing markets, providing an indicator of the
availability of housing relative to the demand for housing.
This report summarizes housing vacancies in the United
States using data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2008–2024
1-year American Community Survey. Key findings include that
in 2024, there were 146.7 million total homes in the United
States. Of this total, 86.6 million were owner-occupied and
46.1 million were renter-occupied, while 14.0 million homes
were vacant. Most of these vacant homes were not available
to be purchased or rented. Total vacancies include units
that are rented and not occupied; sold and not occupied; for
seasonal, recreational, or occasional use; and for migrant
workers, as well as other vacancies that do not fit into
these categories. Researchers also found that vacancy rates
have fallen over the last 15 years. Specifically, in 2008,
the homeowner vacancy rate was 2.7%, 1.7 percentage points
higher than in 2024. The rental vacancy rate was 7.9% in
2008, 2.2 percentage points higher than in 2024. The decline
in vacancies has partially coincided with a period of
increases in housing prices and rent and are consistent
with a tightening housing market, in which demand for
housing is greater than the supply of housing available.
|
|
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
|
|
After a period of intensive policy support, the U.S.
electric vehicle (EV) market now faces an uncertain and
fragmented policy environment, with likely consequences for
efforts to reduce tailpipe-sourced air pollution. This
report benchmarks states’ electric vehicle policy
implementation, with scores ranging from zero to 11 out of a
possible 13. The scoring framework is organized around five
pillars: 1) consumer incentives; 2) environmental standards;
3) charging infrastructure; 4) market access; and 5)
government procurement. Together, these five pillars are
grounded in multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed literature
that spans environmental economics, transportation planning,
and public policy, as well as other frameworks policy
research organizations tracking state-level EV policy have
developed. Together, the pillars seek to cover the major
ways in which states can shape the EV policy environment.
Key findings include that electric vehicle policies are
concentrated in a relatively small group of states. The
highest scores are concentrated in the Northeast, the West
Coast, and a few additional states such as Colorado and
Maryland. For example, California and Massachusetts have the
highest scores, at 11. The states are followed by a group of
states scoring 10: Colorado, Oregon, Maryland, New York,
Delaware, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Maine. These states
have adopted policies across several parts of the EV policy
landscape rather than relying on one policy area alone.
Conversely, Indiana, Ohio, Nebraska, Montana, Louisiana, and
South Dakota all score zero. Florida scored between 4 and 7
for its meaningful policy commitments, however coverage was
uneven across pillars. Market access was noted as the clear
strength.
|
|
Source: Brookings Institute
|
|
|
This report presents 2024 data on U.S. births by selected
characteristics. A total of 3,628,934 births occurred in the
United States in 2024, an increase of 1% from the record low
reported for 2023. The general fertility rate declined 1%
from 2023 to 53.8 births per 1,000 females ages 15–44 in
2024. Birth rates declined for females ages 15–34 from 2023
to 2024, rose for women ages 40–44, and were unchanged for
females ages 10–14 and women ages 35–39 and 45–49. The total
fertility rate declined 1% to 1,599.5 births per 1,000 women
in 2024, a record low. Birth rates declined for both
unmarried and married women from 2023 to 2024. Prenatal care
beginning in the first trimester declined to 75.5% in 2024.
The percentage of women who smoked during pregnancy declined
to 2.4%. The cesarean delivery rate increased by less than
1% to 32.4%. Private insurance as the source of payment for
the delivery increased to 51.8% of births, while Medicaid
deliveries declined to 40.2%. The preterm birth rate
(10.41%) was unchanged from 2023; low birthweight births
declined 1% (8.52%).
|
|
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
|
|
The twin birth rate (twin births per 1,000 total births)
rose 79% from 1980 (18.9) to 2014 (33.9), then began to
decline. Trends in twin childbearing are of public health
interest because of the increased maternal and neonatal risk
compared with singleton pregnancies. This report describes
trends in the number and rate of twins born in the United
States from the most recent high in 2014 through 2024. The
twin birth rate declined an average 1% per year from 2014
(33.9 twins per 1,000 births) to 2024 (30.1) for a total
decline of 11%. The number of births in twin deliveries
declined an average 2% per year from 2014 (135,336) to 2024
(109,195) for a total decline of 19%. In comparison, the
number of births in singleton deliveries declined 9% (from
3,848,214 to 3,517,151) over the same decade. By maternal
age, the largest declines in twinning rates from 2014 to
2024 were for mothers age 30 and older. Among the three
largest race and Hispanic-origin groups, twin birth rates
declined 15% for White non-Hispanic (36.7 to 31.3) and 3%
for Hispanic (24.1 to 23.4) mothers, and rose 5% for Black
non-Hispanic mothers (40.0 to 42.0).
|
|
Source: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
|
|
Tobacco and nicotine use is the leading cause of preventable
death in the United States, and its burden falls hardest on
the roughly 43 million adults covered by Medicaid, who use
tobacco at more than twice the rate of adults with private
insurance. Cessation medications are among the most
cost-effective treatments in health care, and helping
enrollees quit decreases the substantial tobacco-related
costs Medicaid already bears. Even so, most enrollees who
want to quit never get evidence-based help. Treatment rates
stayed very low, with only about 1 in 9 enrollees who likely
needed treatment for tobacco or nicotine use receiving it.
The estimated share of adults with daily tobacco or nicotine
use who received cessation medication was 11.4% in 2019 and
11.5% in 2025, dipping somewhat in the intervening years.
Total treatment prescriptions increased slightly, and the
mix shifted sharply toward nicotine replacement therapy.
Total fills rose 9.1%, from 2.8 million to 3.1 million. Over
the same period, varenicline fills fell 35%, while nicotine
replacement therapy fills rose 28.8% and grew to nearly
two-thirds of all cessation fills. Treatment varied
enormously across states. In 2025, fills per 1,000 enrollees
who use tobacco or nicotine daily ranged from 909 in Utah to
38 in Alabama, a more than twentyfold gap between the
highest and lowest states.
|
|
Source: Urban Institute
|
N O T E : An online subscription may be required to view some items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Program Summaries (GPS) provides descriptive information on Florida state agencies, including funding, contact information, and references to other sources of agency information.
|
A publication of the Florida Legislature's Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability.
Click here to subscribe to this publication.
As a joint legislative unit, OPPAGA works with both the
Senate and the House of Representatives to conduct
objective research, program reviews, and contract
management for the Florida Legislature.
PolicyNotes, published every Friday, features reports, articles, and websites with timely information of interest to policymakers and researchers. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations
expressed by third parties as reported in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect OPPAGA's views.
Permission is granted to make and distribute verbatim copies of
PolicyNotes provided that this section is preserved on all copies.
|
|