Performance-Based Program Budgeting in Context: History and Comparison
Report 96-77A, April 1997
Report Summary
- Both in past budget reform experiences in Florida and the federal government and in current reforms nationwide, some key implementation issues affect continuing success:
- The Legislature should focus on performance and accountability through clarifying agency and program mission and expected outcomes. It should direct agencies to prepare outcome measures of their contribution to expected results of government programs. It should require output measures of the quality and cost-effectiveness of agency products and services, so that the Legislature has budget decision tools. The Legislature should then develop ways to encourage and reward good results and to discourage poor ones.
Related Reports
-
Florida's Unit Cost Initiative Shows Promise, But Needs Development
Report 01-05 January 2001 -
Recent Initiatives Strengthen Florida's Performance-Based Budgeting System
Report 00-15 November 2000 -
PB2 Status Report Performance-Based Budgeting Has Produced Benefits But Its Usefulness Can Be Improved
Report 98-45 January 1999 -
Performance-Based Program Budgeting in Florida: Current Status and Next Steps
Report 96-77B April 1997
Copies of this report in print or alternate accessible format may be obtained by email OPPAGA@oppaga.fl.gov, telephone (850) 488-0021,
or mail 111 W. Madison St., Room 312 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1475.
Copies of this report in print or alternate accessible format may be obtained by email OPPAGA@oppaga.fl.gov, telephone (850) 488-0021,
or mail 111 W. Madison St., Room 312 Tallahassee, FL 32399-1475.
performance measures, program budgeting, performance based budgeting